22–26 Sept 2025
Moho
Europe/Paris timezone

Isotopic fission fragments yields in the Thorium region produced in inverse-kinematics with a 232Th beam.

Not scheduled
20m
Moho

Moho

16 bis Quai Hamelin 14000 CAEN
Oral Presentation Nuclear Structure, Spectroscopy and Dynamics Parallel session

Speaker

Alex Cobo Zarzuelo (GANIL)

Description

A general description of the fission mechanism considers both microscopical quantities, such as nuclear structure of the fission fragments, and macroscopic effects, like the Coulomb repulsion between the nuclei. The interplay between both quantities prevents, so far, from a fully microscopical description of the interaction. Despite the development of different theoretical models [1] and simulation codes based on experimental data, such as GEF [2], the fission process is not reproduced with enough accuracy along the nuclear chart. A large set of experimental data is needed in order to constrain the models.

Using the inverse-kinematics technique and multi-nucleon transfer reactions, the fission process is studied at GANIL with the VAMOS++ spectrometer [3]. This enables the isotopic identification of complete fission fragment distributions [4]. Moreover, the coupling of this spectrometer to a highly stripped silicon detector (PISTA) allows the identification of the fissioning system and the reconstruction of its excitation energy with high resolution.

A new experiment was conducted at VAMOS++ with the newly accelerated $^{232}Th$ beam at Coulomb energies. Transfer reactions performed with a $^{12}C$ target permitted to populate fissioning systems from $^{230}Th$ up to $^{244}Cm$. The produced nuclei lay on a region closer to the known transition between asymmetric to symmetric fission in the actinides [5]. This allows the systematic study of the shell-closure effects occurring for different deformation parameters, like octupolar deformation, recently proposed to be responsible for the asymmetric fission in the actinides region [6]. Moreover, experimental results show that the isotopic distributions around Th isotopes deviate from the general actinide behaviour [7].

The experimental setup included the VAMOS++ spectrometer, which was composed of a pair of magnetic quadrupoles and a dipole, and a set of Multi-Wire Proportional Counters (MWPCs) before and after the optical modules. An Ionization Chamber (IC) was also positioned at the end of the focal plane. Moreover, around the target position, PISTA detector was located, as well as another MWPC placed at 40$^\circ$ with respect to the VAMOS axis. This detector was included for the simultaneous measurement of the velocity of both fission fragments on an event by event basis. In this work, the isotopic and mass fission fragment yields will be presented as a function of the excitation energy of the fissioning system. On top of this, neutron excess of the fragments will be shown, as well as some correlations between both fission fragments.

[1] Schunck, N and Robledo, LM , Reports on Progress in Physics $\textbf{79}$ (2016) 116301.
[2] Karl-Heinz Schmidt and Beatriz Jurado , Reports on Progress in Physics $\textbf{81}$ (2018) 106301.
[3] M.Rejmund $\textit{et al.}$, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A $\textbf{646}$ (2011) 184-191.
[4] Ramos, D., et al. Isotopic fission-fragment distributions of $^{238}U$, $^{239}Np$, $^{240}Pu$, $^{244}Cm$, and $^{250}Cf$ produced through inelastic scattering, transfer, and fusion reactions in inverse kinematics. Physical review C, 97(5), 054612.
[5] Möller, P., & Randrup, J. (2015). Calculated fission-fragment yield systematics in the region 74 $\leq$ Z$\leq$ 94 and 90$\leq$N$\leq$ 150. Physical Review C, 91(4), 044316
[6] Scamps, G., & Simenel, C. (2019). Effect of shell structure on the fission of sub-lead nuclei. PhysicalReview C, 100(4), 041602.
[7] Schmidt, K. H., et al. (2024). Identifying and overcoming deficiencies of nuclear data on the fission of light actinides by use of the GEF code. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 208, 110784.

Author

Alex Cobo Zarzuelo (GANIL)

Co-authors

Alexis FRANCHETEAU Dr Antoine Lemasson (GANIL / CNRS) Beatriz Errandonea Benoît Mauss (CEA) Caterina Ciampi (GANIL) Dr Diego Gruyer (LPC Caen) Dr Diego RAMOS DOVAL (GANIL) Dr Emmanuel CLEMENT (GANIL) Filippo Angelini (INFN-LNL, University of Padova) Gilles de FRANCE (GANIL/IN2P3/CNRS) Hemantika SENGAR (GANIL) Igor Tsekhanovich Indu Jangid (GANIL) Dr John Frankland (IN2P3) Jose Antonio Dueñas Dr Jose Luis Rodriguez Sanchez (University of Coruña) Julien Taieb (CEA) Dr Laurent Audouin (Université Paris-Saclay) Lucas Bégué--Guillou (Ganil) Lucas de De Arruda Serra Filho (GANIL (Unicaen) + Uppsala) MANUEL CAAMAÑO FRESCO (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) MIGUEL LOZANO GONZALEZ (IGFAE-USC) Maurycy Rejmund (GANIL) Navin Alahari (GANIL) Neeraj Kumar (Grand Accélérateur National d’Ions Lourds (GANIL)) Dr Pierre Morfouace (CEA, DAM, DIF) Mr Shayan Kumar (GANIL, University of Caen, Normandy) Taiki Tanaka christelle schmitt (IPHC Strasbourg)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.