4–9 juin 2023
Palais des Papes - Avignon - France
Fuseau horaire Europe/Paris
Thanks to all for an outstanding conference - see you in Fukushima for ARIS 2026!

First beta-delayed neutron spectroscopy of doubly-magic $^{24}O$.

8 juin 2023, 17:30
15m
oral contribution spectroscopy parallel session

Orateur

Shree Neupane (University of Tennessee)

Description

Located at the neutron drip-line, $^{24}O$ is the heaviest doubly-magic isotope of the oxygen isotopic chain. As the $Q_\beta$ value increases and the neutron separation energy in the daughter nucleus decreases for the neutron-rich nucleus, beta-delayed neutron emission becomes a dominant decay mode, and neutron energy measurement is vital in studying the beta decay to the neutron unbound states. Also, spectroscopy of such drip-line nuclei may provide important information regarding the effects of nuclear interactions and many-body correlations in determining the limits of nuclear stability [1].

The neutron energy spectrum measurement of the beta-delayed neutron precursor $^{24}O$ was performed for the first time at National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL) using a neutron time-of-flight array (VANDLE[2]) accompanied by gamma spectroscopy setup. New half-life and beta decay branching ratios are extracted. The beta-gamma and beta-delayed neutron measurements following the decay of $^{24}O$ provided the excitation energies and beta decay strength distribution to both neutron-bound and unbound states in $^{24}F$. The decay of "doubly-magic" $^{24}O$ is an excellent case to test the quality of the state-of-the-art calculations of the beta-decay strength distribution near the neutron drip line. The experimental results are compared with the shell model calculation using the standard, empirical USDB interaction, and state-of-the-art ab initio calculations such as those using the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG), coupled cluster model or shell-model embedded in the continuum.

[1] T. L. Tang et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 212502 (2020).
[2] W. A. Peters et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 836, 122 (2016).

Authors

Shree Neupane (University of Tennessee) Noritaka Kitamura (Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37966, USA) Zhengyu Xu (University of Tennessee, Knoxville) Robert Grzywacz (University of Tennessee, Knoxville) Joseph Heideman (University of Tennessee Knoxville) Toby King (Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA) Miguel Madurga Kevin Siegl (Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37966, USA) Philipp Wagenknecht (University of Tennessee) Aaron Chester (Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA) Andrea Richard (National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA)

Documents de présentation