May 20 – 23, 2025
IP2I
Europe/Paris timezone

Contribution List

30 out of 30 displayed
Export to PDF
  1. Dr Florian NORTIER (CNRS/IN2P3 - IP2I Lyon)
    5/20/25, 1:55 PM
  2. Gia Dvali
    5/20/25, 2:05 PM
    Gravity, Forms & Generalized Symmetries
  3. Otari Sakhelashvili
    5/20/25, 3:00 PM
    Gravity, Forms & Generalized Symmetries
  4. Seth Koren
    5/20/25, 3:30 PM
    Gravity, Forms & Generalized Symmetries
  5. Raffaele DAgnolo
    5/20/25, 4:30 PM
  6. Pablo Sesma (IPhT Saclay)
    5/20/25, 5:25 PM
    Cosmological Selection of Vacuum
  7. Geraldine Servant (CERN)
    5/20/25, 5:55 PM
    Cosmological Selection of Vacuum

    In this talk, I re-visit the original relaxion model by Graham-Kaplan-Rajendran in the regime where the relaxion is subject to large fluctuations during its dynamics. I discuss the modified stopping conditions for such dynamics of the relaxion and the new parameter space. Interestingly, in a significant region of the parameter space, the relaxion can naturally account for the observed dark...

    Go to contribution page
  8. Maximilian Detering (King's College London)
    5/21/25, 9:00 AM
    Cosmological Selection of Vacuum

    Self-organised criticality, realised through cosmological dynamics in the early universe, is an alternative paradigm for addressing the electroweak hierarchy problem. In this scenario, an unnaturally light Higgs boson is the result of dynamics driving the electroweak vacuum towards a near-critical metastable point where the Higgs mass is bounded from above by the vacuum instability scale. To...

    Go to contribution page
  9. Gabriele Rigo (IPhT, Saclay)
    5/21/25, 9:30 AM
    Cosmological Selection of Vacuum
  10. Thomas Steingasser
    5/21/25, 10:30 AM
    Cosmological Selection of Vacuum
  11. Manuel Ettengruber
    5/21/25, 11:00 AM
    Flavor Puzzle
  12. James Wells (University of Michigan)
    5/21/25, 11:30 AM

    After discussing some history of the hierarchy problem, I recast the hierarchy problem as a legitimate paradox. The premises and reasoning of the paradox are explained. I discuss how each premise has been attacked and what ideas are still standing and which directions are perhaps less interesting today after a generation of experimental and theoretical work.

    Go to contribution page
  13. Dr Giacomo Cacciapaglia (LPTHE)
    5/21/25, 2:15 PM
    Flavor Puzzle
  14. Stephen F. King
    5/21/25, 3:10 PM
    Flavor Puzzle
  15. Prof. Gino Isidori (University of Zurich)
    5/21/25, 4:45 PM
    Flavor Puzzle
  16. Shahram Vatani (CP3 UCLouvain)
    5/22/25, 9:00 AM
    Fixed Point & Compositeness

    We study the IR fate of Chiral Gauge Theories through functional methods and the Effective Average Action. Our results show a rich structure, from the existence of IR conformality to new patterns of Chiral Symmetry Breaking.

    Go to contribution page
  17. Juan Pablo Garcés Varas
    5/22/25, 9:30 AM
    Fixed Point & Compositeness
  18. Deog Ki Hong
    5/22/25, 10:30 AM
    Fixed Point & Compositeness

    We carry out a detailed analysis of the region slightly outside the conformal window of a non-trivial infrared fixed point in a generic bottom-up holographic setup. We focus on models, which study the dynamics of a scalar field, dual to quark degrees of freedom, in a (nearly) AdS geometry. Such models realize the picture expected for vector-like near-conformal theories from Dyson-Schwinger...

    Go to contribution page
  19. Maya Hager
    5/22/25, 11:25 AM
    Fixed Point & Compositeness
  20. Wanda Isnard (IP2I Lyon)
    5/22/25, 11:55 AM
    Fixed Point & Compositeness

    I will describe a model of hybrid inflation coming from a general composite theory. Starting from an effective chiral Lagrangian with a dilaton and pions, we identify inflation occurring during the walking dynamics of the theory. A Z2 symmetry-breaking term in the pion sector induces a shift in the inflaton’s trajectory, which leads to a tachyonic instability phase. Curvature perturbations...

    Go to contribution page
  21. Kamila Kowalska
    5/22/25, 2:15 PM
    Fixed Point & Compositeness
  22. Andreas Trautner (Max-Planck-Institut fuer Kernphysik Heidelberg)
    5/22/25, 3:10 PM
    Axion-Like Particles (ALPs), pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons (pNGBs) & Accidents
  23. Emilian Dudas (Ecole Polytechnique)
    5/22/25, 4:10 PM
    Axion-Like Particles (ALPs), pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons (pNGBs) & Accidents
  24. Matthew McCullough (CERN)
    5/22/25, 5:05 PM
    Axion-Like Particles (ALPs), pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons (pNGBs) & Accidents
  25. Enrico Nardi (INFN Roma Italy & Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin Colombia)
    5/23/25, 9:00 AM
    Axion-Like Particles (ALPs), pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons (pNGBs) & Accidents
  26. Adriana Guerrero Menkara
    5/23/25, 10:25 AM
    Axion-Like Particles (ALPs), pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons (pNGBs) & Accidents

    For pNGB-based approaches, the phenomenological question of Higgs naturalness finds itself at a tipping point between direct searches and precision. As we look ahead to the HL-LHC era and beyond, a scenario in which all measurements remain Standard Model-like would only sharpen the naturalness tension, driven increasingly by precision constraints. To illustrate this from a fresh perspective,...

    Go to contribution page
  27. Felix Bruemmer (LUPM Montpellier)
    5/23/25, 10:55 AM
    Axion-Like Particles (ALPs), pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons (pNGBs) & Accidents
  28. Irene Valenzuela (IFT UAM-CSIC Madrid)
    5/23/25, 1:50 PM
    Ultraviolet (UV) / Infrared (IR) Mixing
  29. Steven Abel (IPPP)
    5/23/25, 2:45 PM
    Ultraviolet (UV) / Infrared (IR) Mixing
  30. Dr Florian NORTIER (CNRS/IN2P3 - IP2I Lyon)
    5/23/25, 3:40 PM