Top LHC France 2018

Enquête

Top-LHC-France 2018: your feedback

Who are you ?

You work in (only one answer)*

theory

ATLAS experiment

CMS experiment

other

If other, in which field do you work?

Your position*

Undergraduate

PhD student

Post-doc

Staff

Other

What is(are) the reason(s) for which you attend this meeting?*

How have you been aware of the meeting?*

colleagues

announcement mail

lettre IN2P3

other

Would you have prefered to have the talks in French/English?*

I prefer in English

I don’t understand French

I prefer in French

I don’t mind

Would you have prefered to have the discussions in French/English?*

I prefer in English

I don’t understand French

I prefer in French

I don’t mind

Did you attend:*

the whole meeting

1 half day session

2 half day sessions

3 half day sessions

If you didn't attend the whole meeting, would you like to tell us why (for instance other important meeting in parallel we should keep in mind for future editions?)

Meeting content

About the thematics:*

All or almost all the subjects were interesting

Several subjects were not of interest for you

You have ideas of other subjects to discuss (please give them below)

Most of the subjects addressed were not interesting

About the level of details, in average:*

You find the detail level appropriate

The talks contained too much details

The talks didn't address enough details

No opinion

About the level of difficulties for theory talks:*

too difficult

difficult

adequate

easy

too easy

About the level of difficulties for experimental talks:*

too difficult

difficult

adequate

easy

too easy

Please give us feedback on the meeting content: in particular eleborate on what you didn't like and tell us what you appreciate the most. Suggestions are also welcome.

For our future editions: would you apreciate to have introductory (educational) talks for each subject?*

yes

no

don't mind

For our future editions: would you appreciate to have a half day hands-on session on technical issues before or after the workshop?*

yes

no

don't mind

For these potential hands-on sessions, do you have suggestions about topics to discuss ?

For our future editions: would you appreciate to have a question/answer session one evening for the students?*

yes

no

don't mind

For these potential question/answer session, do you have suggestions?

Meeting format

The meeting length was*

adequate

too long

too short

The talk length was*

adequate

too long

too short

The time left for discussions was*

adequate

too long

too short

The breaks were*

adequate

too long

too short

Do you think this meeting is a good opportunity for PHD student to present a talks*

yes

no

About the balance between PHD student and senior talks:*

the balance is good

I would have prefered more PHD student talks

I would have prefered more senior talks

About the balance between theoretical and experimental talks:*

the balance is good

I would have prefered more theoretical talks

I would have prefered more experimental talks

Any comments or suggestions about the meeting format ?

Local organisation

The room for talks and discussions was*

Adequate

Not adequate

The lunch time, place and quality*

very good

good

correct

could have been better

bad

too expensive

The dinner place and quality was*

very good

good

correct

could have been better

bad

too expensive

Comments about the organisation ? please indicate in particular what was appreciated or not and suggestions to improve.

Comments, remarks, suggestions....

The good ?

The bad ?

Any other remarks or suggestions

Vos réponses seront envoyées anonymement.