6 - morning wrap-up - structure of the afternoon's discussions
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified needs and goals:
- current situation is not good enough
- Demonstrate that we have a policy to allocate resources and we control the situation.
- Need of accountability. 
- re-equilbrate the distribution of resources between different communities
- Efficiently deliver a "non trivial quality of service"

Key concepts: 
- A priori and a posteriori analysis for RA
- need of scientific coordination for taking decisions - bodies to identify
- Introduction of a "user" dimension in the structure of operations

Key Challenges:
- Challenges linked to the grid context: 
	- control is difficult
	- funding comes from multiple sources
- need to keep the grid as a tool allowing new communities to join in and use resources
- link local, national and international aspects

Steps already done, to investigate and continue:
- initiated collaboration with GENCI
- initiated collaboration with PL-Grid

Questions that emerged:
- What is the Composition of the scientific commitees that decide on RA
- how will we have to consider the international level
- what is the return on investment

Reminder: Questions we need to address by the end of the day:

- What is the right legal term to agreements SLA/MoU/else?
- What are the entities that need to be involved in the definition of a agreements?
- What do SLAs apply on? What are the “fields” and units?

- France-Grilles context specificities/ international context
- What kind of Service Level Management do we plan on?
- Expected return of investment in terms of quality of service and traceability